Cases 91 - 100 of 1,022
Roberts v. Ramsey et al
as 4:2023cv10028
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lamar Roberts
Defendant:
Rick Ramsey and Matthew Corey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgans v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Lamar Burgans
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv01911
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morell, Andrea Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Marion County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lamar Bryant
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff, Billy Woods and FNU Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00699
Petitioner:
Jerome Lamar Pitts and Jeron Pitts
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Clifton Lamar Jones
Defendant:
Nick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Courtney Lamar Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Bell v. USA
as 23-10928
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH LAMAR BELL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Simpson v. Gwinnett County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Irvin Lamar Simpson
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff Office, Gwinnett County Jail, Sheriff Joey Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
