Cases 121 - 130 of 157,316
Jones v. Mac
as 8:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Big Mac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Patsy's Bail Bond
as 8:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Patsy's Bail Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ussery v. State of GA et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Roger Ussery
Respondent:
State of GA, Georgia State Prison and R. U. Jackson
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOUGLAS v. AMMONS
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
MELISSA A DOUGLAS
Defendant:
Judge G WAYNE AMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgeway v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Clifton Marshall Ridgeway
Defendant:
Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Hut et al
as 7:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Deontae L Hudson
Defendant:
Hut, McCovery, Hardclaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland, Lamundrick v. Weston et al
as 1:2024cv21896
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R. Cleveland
Defendant:
Kathryn D. Weston and Amie M. Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaffer
Respondent:
Chad Chronister, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Hendricks et al
as 8:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Omar Diaz, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristin K. Hendricks, John O'Connor, Erin Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
