Cases 11 - 20 of 5,066
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr, Daniel v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14178
Plaintiff:
Daniel G Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephenson Smith v. Ted Jackson, et al
as 24-11826
Plaintiff:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
TED JACKSON, OFFICER JONES and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Smith v. Clophat et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Jean Joseph Clophat and Inmate Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Joseph et al
as 6:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Clophat Peun Joseph and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Norman Hampton
Defendant:
Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Norman Hampton
Defendant:
Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Respondent:
Warden Joshua Jones, Tyrone Oliver, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
