Cases 11 - 20 of 529
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael B. Bishop, Marcus J. Bailey, Steven D. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VANNESS v. BAILEY
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
BRIAN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Bey v. Carlton et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Jhakeel Jacksonbey and Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton, J. Burkett, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Middleton v. Uhaul Company et al
as 4:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Uhaul Company, City of Savannah Police Dept., Sheriff John Wilcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Chatham County, Chief of Police of Savannah Police Department, Nickolas Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Willis
as 1:2023cv04423
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bailey
Defendant:
Fani Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
