Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Greene v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv02812
Plaintiff:
Tamika Greene
Defendant:
Shirley Smith, Horace Porterfield and C. Carlisle
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Coatey et al
as 2:2011cv01439
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
S Coatney, Deaundra Johnson, Yambip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv08018
Petitioner:
Joseph Carlis Carlisle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carlisle v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00766
Petitioner:
Marcus Dawanell Carlisle
Respondent:
United States of America
Jackson v. Carlisle et al
as 5:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jackson
Defendant:
Harold Carlisle, John Cary Bittick, Officer Haskin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Culver v. Carlisle et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2008cv00556
Plaintiff:
Melvin Dupree Culver
Defendant:
CO Carlisle , Reid J. Downs , CO Mitchel and others
Cause Of Action: O
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Overstreet et al
as 1:2007cv00112
Plaintiff:
Willie Wesley Brown
Defendant:
J. Carlisle Overstreet, Elaine C. Johnson and Ronald Strength
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middlebrooks v. Richmond County, Georgia Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gerarde Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Richmond County, Georgia Sheriff's Office, Richard Chase, James Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Leopard et al
as 1:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
James Robert Webb
Defendant:
Greg Leopard, Rodney Quesenberry, J. Carlisle Overstreet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
