Cases 11 - 20 of 309
Curry v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Dominiqic I. Curry
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Sheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Curry v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13486
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Curry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Gerhardt et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
M. Wayne Gerhardt, Jude Washington, Michael T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRIE v. MCKINNEY et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
DEVON CURRIE
Defendant:
MCKINNEY and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Runnell Deshay Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chau v. Norris et al
as 8:2023cv01273
Defendant:
Detective Jonathan Norris, Blake and Detective Richard Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cuong Man Chau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUNGE v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUNGE
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, RICKY DIXON, HEATH HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddie Curry v. Hall County Jail, et al
as 23-10735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE DAWAINE CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
HALL COUNTY JAIL, ROBERTS, PAYTON and others
Curry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
