Cases 11 - 20 of 35
WILHELM v. BUCZYNSKY
as 3:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE WILHELM
Defendant:
PAUL BUCZYNSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhelm v. Buczynsky
as 1:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Wilhelm
Defendant:
Paul Buczynsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Sampson v. USA
as 17-14265
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY LEE SAMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Patrie v. Unknown Defendants of the Medical and Pharmacy Department, at USP Coleman One
as 5:2016cv00630
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Patrie
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants of the Medical and Pharmacy Department, at USP Coleman One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Patrie v. Unknown Defendants of the Medical and Pharmacy Department, at USP Coleman One
as 6:2016cv01761
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Patrie
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants of the Medical and Pharmacy Department, at USP Coleman One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Sparklin v. Kenneth Wilkerson, et al
as 16-15958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY LEE SPARKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH WILKERSON, Correctional Officer and D. GWAZDA, Correctional Officer
Sampson v. United States of America
as 9:2016cv81008
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Sampson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Matthew Morris v. Okeechobee Board of County Com, et al
as 15-15645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW PAUL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
OKEECHOBEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Paul C. May, Sheriff, ADMINISTRATOR OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Ronnie White and others
Reid v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2015cv00641
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Irivin Reid
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPARKLIN v. WILKERSON et al
as 5:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE SPARKLIN
Defendant:
KENNETH WILKERSON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
