Cases 11 - 20 of 1,451
Patrick v. Ennis et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Shelley Milton, Judge Edgar W. Ennis, Jr., William Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv02733
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Wanda Dallas, Victor Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00337
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Z. Rivers, Tyler W. Norman and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Antwoan Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00359
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 7:2024cv01042
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braggs v. Carter et al
as 8:2024cv01331
Defendant:
S. Carter, Jordan Hunter, Mrs. Sapov and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Travell Braggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward C, et al
as 24-11913
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. FILLMORE
Respondent:
NATHAN STONER, JAMES CARTER, JOSEPH HOOVER and others
QUINN v. JOHNSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00163
Participant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Petitioner:
RANDALL TULLY QUINN
Respondent:
Warden CURTIS CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brent Jacoby v. Fisher, et al
as 24-11695
Defendant:
FISHER, GORDY, BLACK and others
Plaintiff:
BRENT JACOBY
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Defendant:
GODDARD, WHEATON, CHERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
