Cases 201 - 210 of 22,916
Dunn v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv08009
Petitioner:
Cindy Louise Hyche Dunn
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Willison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
John William Herring, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Willison and Officer Frooster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dillon
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
Sonia Hernandez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Payne v. Shianna et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Markus OShea Payne
Defendant:
Shianna, Brittany, Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. Segal
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nicholos Kirk Roberts
Defendant:
Andrew John Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricks v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tyson Ricks
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Young, Drew Wade, Andrew C Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
