Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Luke v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Petitioner:
Aaron Luke
Respondent:
The State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Richmond County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SADLER v. MORGAN
as 4:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Defendant:
MARGUERITE MORGAN, V ALBERTS, MARCELLUS TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. United States Of America
as 6:2014cv00026
Petitioner:
Annie L. Hopkins
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Ward et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00391
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Greg Ward, Carl Rowe, Ben Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORNE v. MORGAN
as 4:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
LAVENSTON LAMONT HORNE
Defendant:
MARGUERITE MORGAN, ANNIE JACKSON, WAYNE ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, S. Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annie Jackson v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 12-15958
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANNIE JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Williams v. McDaniel, Jr. et al
as 1:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Aaron Williams
Defendant:
Luther McDaniel, Jr., Bernard Mulherin Sr. and Michael Annis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
