Cases 21 - 30 of 529
Bailey v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2023cv81294
Plaintiff:
Keiontae Renard Bailey
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and Dr. Marcos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Labat
as 1:2023cv04049
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bailey
Defendant:
Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPMAN SR v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
TREVON D CHAPMAN SR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRIAN SHAVERS, DEPUTY WARDEN SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RESHAD THOMPSON
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JUSTIN BAILEY and GARZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Mack
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Thomas Justin Bailey
Respondent:
Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Rogers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Captain Norman and Brian Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. City of Savannah Police Dept. et al
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
City of Savannah Police Dept., Savannah Chief of Police, Bailey Moise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitchen v. Sutton et al
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
William George Kitchen, III
Defendant:
Ms. Sutton, Chatham County Detention Center/Jail, John T. Wilcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
