Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan Stewart
Defendant:
Edwina Johnson, Elizabeth Bowles, Tom Gramiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. Deal et al
as 5:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Derrick Diontay Harden
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Gregory C. Dozier, Robert O. Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARD, et al v. DOE et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant:
John Doe, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Bowling et al
as 8:2017cv01560
Plaintiff:
Nelson Santiago
Defendant:
Cory S. Bowling and Police K-9 Valor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kazi Bowles v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 17-12720
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAZI BOWLES
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Harris v. Deal et al
as 5:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Homer Bryson, Tom Gramiack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Sheffield, City of et al
as 3:2016cv01485
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquette Myers
Defendant:
Sheffield, City of, Ian Sanford, Sheffield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv21697
Plaintiff:
Kazi Bowles
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowles v. Bowles Campbell
as 1:2015cv03164
Plaintiff:
Wesley Brock Bowles
Defendant:
Ruth Elizabeth Bowles Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Bowling et al
as 7:2015cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Phillip Bowling, Timothy Howell, Kyle Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
