Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Gafford v. Dunn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2016cv01399
Plaintiff: David Scott Gafford
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Willie Thomas and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Dunn et al
as 7:2016cv01398
Plaintiff: David Scott Gafford
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Willie Thomas, Teresa Domac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Dunn et al
as 5:2015cv01480
Plaintiff: David Scott Gafford
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Luther Strange and State Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Dunn (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00581
Plaintiff: David Scott Gafford
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00524
Plaintiff: David Scott Gafford
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn, Phyllis Billups, Officer White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv14168
Petitioner: Tyrone David Scott
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Compton v. Crawford et al
as 1:2013cv00195
Plaintiff: David Scott Compton
Defendant: Sgt. Crawford and Sgt. Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compton v. McDuffie County Detention Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00105
Plaintiff: David Scott Compton
Defendant: McDuffie County Detention Center and Logan Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Young v. USA
as 12-13696
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID SCOTT LEWIS YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tyrone Scott v. USA
as 12-13440
Petitioner - Appellant: TYRONE DAVID SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?