Cases 21 - 30 of 899
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Thompkins et al
as 3:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Frederick
Defendant:
Sergeant Thompkins, Officer Johnson and Lieutenant Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bastien v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv04697
Petitioner:
Derrick Chistopher Bastien
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AMERSON v. OLIVER
as 5:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, UNIT MANAGER CHARLES HUDSON, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Grantley v. Melissa Rollins
as 23-13211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA D. ROLLINS
STYLES v. ODUM
as 7:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
DERRICK STYLES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Styles v. Odum
as 4:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
Derrick Styles
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Clevon Randolph, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Salter (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Sgt. Salter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
