Cases 21 - 30 of 57
CLARK v. BAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
LLOYD CURTIS CLARK
Defendant:
BAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and HANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Hanks et al
as 8:2016cv02359
Petitioner:
Darion Conner
Respondent:
Craig Hanks, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelvin Jackson v. Craig Hanks, et al
as 16-14820
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELVIN JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG HANKS, Superintendent Bay Correctional Facility and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
JACKSON v. HANKS et al.
as 1:2016cv21402
Plaintiff:
KELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
CRAIG HANKS and Julie L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tom Fields v. Warden, et al
as 16-11445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM FREDERICK FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN, Security, CHIEF COUNSELOR LETITIA BELL and others
Nixon et al v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2015cv00574
Plaintiff:
Dwight Nixon, Steve Atkinson and Marvin McTeare
Defendant:
Secretary, DOC, Craig Hanks, P. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Cardaryl Freeman
Defendant:
Gerald Allen, Billy Beasley, Scott Beason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01236
Plaintiff:
Pete Hanks
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson et al v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01036
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson, Belinda Allen, Daniel Gatson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. PHILBIN et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
TOM FREDRICK FIELDS
Defendant:
EDWARD PHILBIN, JERRY JEFFERSON, LETITIA BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
