Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 616
Nelson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff: Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Adrienne Givens, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00143
Petitioner: Maurice Antonio Kent
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff: Kenneth Maurice Smith
Defendant: D. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff: KENNETH MAURICE SMITH
Defendant: D PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08015
Petitioner: Kendrell Maurice Bell
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Poku v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02032
Petitioner: Maurice J. Poku, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cogdell v. Prock et al
as 3:2023cv00352
Plaintiff: Carlos Maurice Cogdell
Defendant: Prock, Whitehead and Whalin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00102
Plaintiff: MAURICE CORNEILUS WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant: LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Whittington
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff: Maurice Corneilus Williams, Jr.
Defendant: Lawrence Whittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. State of Florida
as 0:2023cv60439
Plaintiff: Julio Doe and Maurice C. Rocha
Defendant: State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?