Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Foster v. Pearce et al
as 1:2021cv00670
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), Officer Cotton, Warden Pearce and others
Plaintiff:
Santonio Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Warden et al
as 8:2021cv00094
Respondent:
Sheriff, Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Marshals and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks and Adam Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haskew v. United States Marshal
as 8:2021cv00118
Petitioner:
John Michael Haskew
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sartor v. Pearce et al
as 1:2020cv05182
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), The GEO Group, Officer L. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Sartor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cartman v. Unknown U.S. Marshals et al
as 1:2020cv05013
Defendant:
Unknown U.S.P. Atlanta Warden, Unknown Custody Officer, Unknown U.S. Marshals and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony-Vincent Cartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haskew v. United States Marshal
as 8:2020cv02864
Petitioner:
John Michael Haskew
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. Commissioner of Georgia Dept of Corr. et al
as 6:2020cv00106
Respondent:
Warden Trevonzo Bobbitt, U.S. Government, U.S. Marshals and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 6:2020cv00103
Respondent:
Warden Trevonze Bobbit, GDC Commissioner, U.S. Marshals and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gordon et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Mark Mahon, Ronnie Fussell, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Gordon and Jahmal C. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. U.S. Marshals
as 4:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
