Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Thomas v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Thomas
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Bennett, III
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-13452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DeVaughn v. U.S. Marshall Service et al
as 2:2012cv01791
Plaintiff:
Michael O DeVaughn
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall Service and Sheriff of Jefferson County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cartman v. Keller et al
as 1:2012cv00959
Petitioner:
Anthony Vincent Cartman
Respondent:
J.A. Keller and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DeMarsh v. State Attorney's Office (Polk County, Florida) et al
as 8:2011cv02856
Plaintiff:
Monday DeMarsh
Defendant:
State Attorney's Office, Polk County Sheriff's Office, Tomasville Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 1:2011cv02824
Plaintiff:
Britten Wilder
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Bruce Murphy, Leigh Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yeager v. Hardy et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00896
Plaintiff:
Robert Terrell Yeager
Defendant:
A. J. Hardy, Janice Hopkins, Sgt. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mala v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2010cv22359
Plaintiff:
Kelley Norman Joseph Mala
Defendant:
Clay Mitchell, Kenny Atkinson, R Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Watkins v. John Mansch, et al
as 10-12902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS A. WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN M. MANSCH, Chief Jailer, JAIL CONTRACTOR, DR. GRAHAM, Jail's Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
