Cases 21 - 30 of 1,271
Gonzalez v. Decatur, Alabama et al
as 5:2018cv00972
Petitioner:
Alberto Gonzalez
Respondent:
Decatur, Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guy v. Bates et al
as 2:2018cv00974
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Bates, Turner, Jasmine and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Wright et al
as 5:2018cv00971
Petitioner:
Amy Bishop Anderson
Respondent:
Wright and Attorney General of the State of ALabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Serratt v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2018cv00959
Plaintiff:
Girlis Hugh Serratt
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Tuscaloosa County et al
as 7:2018cv00953
Plaintiff:
Ambrienne Barsai Moss
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County and James H Roberts
Mediator:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honeycutt v. St Clair County
as 4:2018cv00936
Petitioner:
Cortez Evans Honeycutt
Respondent:
St Clair County
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marbury v. Estes et al
as 4:2018cv00925
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Marbury
Defendant:
DeWayne Estes, Cedric Specks, Carla Graham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Dunn et al
as 1:2018cv00874
Petitioner:
John Russell Calhoun
Respondent:
Jefferson Dunn and Steve Marshall
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv00837
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Bolling et al
as 2:2018cv00838
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Leon Bolling and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
