Cases 31 - 40 of 225
Hale v. Dozier et al
as 3:2018cv00068
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Warden Murray Tatum, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kemonie Denard Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fridriksson v. Figueroa et al
as 3:2018cv00879
Defendant:
Trayton, Hancock, Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Chance Brogan Fridriksson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Turem v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 18-12734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON CHADWICK TUREM
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASST. WARDEN F. MOCK, Security and Operations, LIEUTENANT M. HALE, G-Dorm Officer-in-Charge and others
Colbert v. Robert et al
as 1:2018cv02160
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Henry Piket Colbert
Defendant:
Warden Robert, Warden Taylor, Warden Gathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Joshua N. Hardin
Defendant:
Sgt J. Jones, A. Zarate, J. Gambrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr
Defendant:
Mick Hale, Brandon Kent Falls, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Gwinnett County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2017cv05513
Plaintiff:
Darrell Costello Hale
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff Office, R.L. (Butch) Conway and John Doe 1 & 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
George W. Hardy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Stan Shepard , Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hales v. Jones
as 1:2017cv24489
Plaintiff:
Gordon Herbert Hales
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Hale v. David Gee, et al
as 17-15359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE FRANK HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GEE, Hillsborough County Sheriff and NAPHCARE INDEPENDENT HEALTHCARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
