Cases 31 - 40 of 143
Oryang v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Billy Mitchum, Dr. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Oryang v. Dr. Siddiq, et al
as 22-10076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant / Appellee:
TAHIR DR. SIDDIQ, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DR. OWENS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
GRADDY v. MERRITT et al
as 4:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD JERMAINE GRADDY
Defendant:
PEYTON MERRITT, CHANDLER BUCHANAN and DERRELL GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. TUZIK et al
as 4:2021cv00155
Defendant:
A J TUZIK, N STRAWN and A VANSUCH
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ANTHONY CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. East Central Regional Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Dr. Sarita Sharma, East Central Regional Hospital and Dr. Ajai Kalla
Plaintiff:
Jordan Chandler Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Commissioner Social Security
as 8:2020cv03009
Plaintiff:
Dale Eugene Chandler
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monroe v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office
as 3:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Chandler Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stegall v. Puckett et al
as 5:2020cv01541
Defendant:
Sgt Aaron Dawson, Chandler, McDuffy and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Isacc Stegall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv01023
Defendant:
P. Hunter, Barry Reddish, Robert Atteberry and others
Plaintiff:
William H. Melendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Edwards et al
as 5:2020cv00202
Defendant:
FNU Franson, FNU Edwards, FNU Warningly and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
