Cases 31 - 40 of 351
LAWSON JR v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAWSON JR
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, PHOEBE HEALTH CARE, LYNN MONTGEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. RICHARDSON et al
as 5:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
RICHARDSON, LAWSON and WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Simmons et al
as 2:2022cv14249
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Jake Simmons, Darius Gibson, Veronica Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Uncle Al's Cookies, IN et al
as 2:2022cv14208
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Uncle Al's Cookies, IN, Officer D. Hower and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Morgan et al
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bernard Lawson
Defendant:
Morgan and Rambo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Haspel v. Nellie Lawson, et al
as 22-10608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HASPEL
Defendant / Appellee:
NELLIE LAWSON, I. THOMAS, B. LAMASTERS and others
Goad v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2022cv80286
Plaintiff:
Olie James Goad
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, State Attorney's Office, Brian Hermanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Barryle Lawson
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and A.A Action Bonding Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barryle Lawson
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and A.A Action Bonding Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddie King v. Lawson
as 21-14492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
