Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Lopez v. Trump et al
as 6:2020cv00965
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Florida, U.S. Attorney General, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fagan v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv00349
Petitioner:
Neil Sean Fagan
Respondent:
Fiel Office Director, Atlanta District Field Office, Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Warden, Stewart Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2019cv21961
Defendant:
Moore, F.D.C. Miami Institution, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Wimsy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kier v. U.S. Attorney General et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv01025
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Maxwell Federal Prison Camp and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Kier, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Barber v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 18-13063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD EUGENE BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL COURTS OF GEORGIA, ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT and others
Dickerson v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 5:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Casey Dickerson
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dickerson v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
Casey Dickerson
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ernest Mallety v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 17-15447
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST MALLETY
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Teran v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2017cv01043
Petitioner:
Francisco Teran
Respondent:
Scotty Rhoden, John Finley, Marc J. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv23040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
