Cases 41 - 50 of 291
Lewis v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Lewis
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Mark Trawick, Spencer Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Billy Darren Murphy
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00711
Plaintiff:
Octavious Danyell Brown
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flagg v. Houston County Sheriff Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00762
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
Houston County Sheriff Department, Houston County Jail, Donald Valenza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00712
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wayne Whitaker
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, James Brazier, Mark Trawick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilgore v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00733
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel O'Brian Kilgore
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, James Brazier, Mark Trawick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00681
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Darnell Whitt
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zito v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Zito
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Wyatt et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00671
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Wyatt and James Brazier
Consolidated Defendant:
Spencer Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
