Cases 41 - 50 of 652
Rojas-Becerril v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Jorge Rojas-Becerril
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Clatys Jenkins, Larry McCovery and John Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02694
Petitioner:
Ignatio Vazquez and Ignacio Vazquez
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02953
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Clatys Jenkins, Laveta Boben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv03228
Petitioner:
Rolando Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pena-Ponce v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02837
Petitioner:
Victor Pena-Ponce
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mata-Arrevalo v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02433
Petitioner:
Eliel Mata-Arrevalo
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and Atlanta Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Warner v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02575
Petitioner:
Mauricio Daniell Warner
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Servantes v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02690
Petitioner:
Yony Ander Bennet Servantes
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
