Cases 41 - 50 of 881
Hazelrigs v. Baker
as 1:2022cv04680
Plaintiff:
Randall Hazelrigs
Defendant:
Lt. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Riverbend Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv04682
Plaintiff:
Davious Boyd
Defendant:
Riverbend Correctional Facility and Lt. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Silva et al
as 6:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Defendant:
Ms. Silva and Warden S. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burge v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Burge
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC, MHM Health Professionals, LLC, Jose R. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpus v. Monsalud et al
as 2:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Mary Monsalud, Colonel Baker and Ms Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Officer McClauley et al
as 6:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Edwards
Defendant:
Officer McClauley, Larry Flonnery, Captain Labelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
James Willie Murry
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail Administration, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Hill et al
as 4:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
James Willie Murry
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail Administration, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Officer McClauley et al
as 6:2022cv01903
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Edwards
Defendant:
Officer McClauley, L. Flonnery, Captain Labelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steve Everette Jenkins v. R. Baker, et al
as 22-13488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE EVERETTE JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BAKER and FNU PITTMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
