Cases 41 - 50 of 343
Baker v. Unknown Government Officials et al
as 4:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Unknown Government Officials and Any and All State, County, City, or Federal Officials
Plaintiff:
John Shane Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. BUSH et al
as 4:2020cv00171
Defendant:
SONNY PERDUE, SAM NUNN, PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH and others
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Bobitt
as 6:2020cv00066
Plaintiff:
Paxvo Ebube Chukwu doing business as Rashond Wesley Baker, Rashond Wesley Baker doing business as Rashond Wesley Baker also known as Paxvo Ebube Chukwu and Paxvo Ebube Chukwu
Defendant:
Trevonza Bobitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. HUGES et al
as 1:2020cv00096
Defendant:
BRENDA HICKS, MACON TRANSITIONAL CENTER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Cowden et al
as 1:2020cv01947
Defendant:
Ellen Masters, Angela Cowden, James Yancey and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 4:2020cv00050
Petitioner:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAKER v. MINTON et al
as 3:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MINTON and CAPTAIN PEACOAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. BURDEN et al
as 3:2019cv00104
Defendant:
OFFICER WELLS, OFFICER BURDEN and OFFICER KING
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Lieutenant WAKEFIELD, Sergeant WRIGHT, Sergeant THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Lieutenant WAKEFIELD, Sergeant WRIGHT, Sergeant THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
