Cases 41 - 50 of 600
Woods v. Secretary Department Of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Mental Health, Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Butler County Commission, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Melissa McCullough
Defendant:
Butler County Commission, Alabama, Danny Bond, Stephen Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Suwannee C.I. et al
as 3:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Suwannee C.I. and Medical Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Bond et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Eugene Boyd
Defendant:
Danny Bond and Parker Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sexton v. Bond et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ray Sexton
Defendant:
Danny Bond and Hannah Scrubs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAISER v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
DAVID J KAISER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, ALOKA D JOSHI, DANNY MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. State of Florida
as 3:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Ofc. Pinell et al
as 3:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Ofc. Pinell and Suwannee C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
