Cases 41 - 50 of 619
Roberson v. Callaway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Roberson
Defendant:
Rolanda Callaway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Kennar
as 1:2022cv04611
Plaintiff:
Rubin J. Gordon
Defendant:
Maurice Kennar
Consolidated Defendant:
Officer Charles Watson, Investigator Thomas and Atlanta Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Nesbit
as 2:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamar Gibson
Defendant:
Nesbit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrell v. Metro Cafe Diner Owner et al
as 1:2022cv04542
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Morrell
Defendant:
Metro Cafe Diner Owner, Javier Viera and Maurice Cambell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODSON v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00395
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODSON
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lefevre v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2022cv03966
Plaintiff:
Sudane Maurice Lefevre
Defendant:
Clayton County and Henry County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWilliams v. Colon
as 1:2022cv23134
Plaintiff:
Maurice McWilliams
Defendant:
Jose Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Coppage v. Benefield et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jarrod Coppage
Defendant:
C.E.O. Jade Benefield, Lucie K. Farmer, Ms Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
