Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Goodman v. The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility et al
as 1:2015cv01468
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility, G.E.O. Group Inc., R. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Focia v. United States of America et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert Focia
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Alabama, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chichakli v. Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv21255
Plaintiff:
Richard Ammar Chichakli
Defendant:
Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons , Director, United States Marshals Service , Director for Grady County Criminal Justice Authority and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
ROLLE v. BRUCE et al
as 4:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
SAM BRUCE, RANDY FRAZEY, BRYAN PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. Bruce et al
as 5:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Sam Bruce, Randy Frazey, Bryan Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLE v. WOMBLE et al
as 4:2014cv00341
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
MIKE WOMBLE, SAM BRUCE, BRYAN PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spriggs v. United States Marshals Service
as 8:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Spriggs
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAACS v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 7:2013cv00127
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ISAACS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-12454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Byrd v. Stephens et al
as 6:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jerome Byrd
Defendant:
Tyson Stephens, Marty Mercer, County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
