Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00085
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Julie Jones, FNU Patterson, FNU Kyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Medical/Dental Department (Ms. Wendy) et al
as 4:2017cv00297
Plaintiff: Lorenzo L. Bradley
Defendant: Wendy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Maurice et al
as 2:2017cv01503
Plaintiff: Henry James Holmes, III
Defendant: Wendy Maurice, Errol Pickens, Ronald Tew and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Charlotte County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2017cv00355
Plaintiff: Randel J. Lindsey
Defendant: Charlotte County Sheriffs Office, Wendy Crawford and Dale Speicher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. United States of America (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00014
Plaintiff: Wendy Latrice Huff
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bailey v. Darby et al
as 8:2016cv03493
Plaintiff: Romulus Bailey
Defendant: A. Darby, Mr.Lambert, M. Cabaliero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Robertson et al
as 1:2016cv03917
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Defendant: Cathelene Tina Robinson, Emma Lucier, R. Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendy Williams v. Ezell, et al
as 16-14967
Plaintiff - Appellant: WENDY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: EZELL, WILSON, NAPH CARE and others
Reiblich v. Moss et al
as 8:2016cv01553
Plaintiff: Mitchell W. Reiblich
Defendant: Dana Moss, Andrew R. Van Sickles, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reiblich v. Moss et al
as 8:2016cv01484
Plaintiff: Mitchell W. Reiblich
Defendant: Dana Moss, Andrew R. Van Sickles, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?