Cases 51 - 60 of 134
Love v. Booker
as 0:2018cv62524
Plaintiff:
Michael Love
Defendant:
Sarah Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Farinas v. Kane et al
as 4:2018cv00243
Defendant:
Thomas Kane and Sarah Saldana
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Farinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GOSS et al
as 1:2018cv00143
Defendant:
CLERK EVONNE MULL, ATTORNEY CHARLES ARNOLD, JR, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER CARR and others
Plaintiff:
TOREY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00639
Defendant:
David Towers, Southern Health Partners, Sarah Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Rodney Bradley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. DeKalb County Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv02953
Plaintiff:
Willie Clarence Lee , Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County Police Department, Kevin McNeill, Sarah Naji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Hunt et al
as 6:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
FNU Hunt, FNU Derbez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merilien v. Siedentopf, Esq. et al
as 1:2018cv02230
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Defendant:
Sarah E. Siedentopf, Esq. , Tina Robinson , Unknown Named Clerk of Fulton County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Mackie et al
as 2:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
J. Jay Justus Christian Sanders, Christina Haile DeBono, Elizabeth Hailesmith and others
Defendant:
V. Arthur William Mackie, L. H. Mackie, D. Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Lones et al
as 6:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
Laurel L. Lones, FNU Pearson, Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clayton
Defendant:
Trezonza Bobbitt, Harold Caravillio, Harold Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
