Cases 51 - 60 of 5,056
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 4:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Brian Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas Jr. v. Morales et al
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Derrel L. Thomas Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Morales and Corporal Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00573
Petitioner:
Larry D. Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Hendry County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Rodney Nigel Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Hendry County Jail, Officer Jones, Officer Croswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Steven Keith Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Chevelle K Hunte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Gaines et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Willie Howard Ferguson
Defendant:
Officer Raymond Lewis Gaines, Officer Quincy Jones, Warden Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
