Cases 61 - 70 of 3,099
Murzike v. McKinney et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. McKinney, Officer Burnette, Secules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newby v. Grantham et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Newby
Defendant:
Madison Grantham, Mary B. Roberson and Steven T. Speakman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Jay et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. Jay, M. Germaine, K. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael B. Bishop, Marcus J. Bailey, Steven D. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel Gaston v. City of Leesburg, et al
as 24-10276
Plaintiff:
ANGEL E. GASTON
Defendant:
CITY OF LEESBURG, In their official capacity, LAKE COUNTY FLORIDA, In their official capacity, JOSEPH IOZZI, In his individual and official capacity and others
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10203
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
Frazier, Kelvin v. Esson et al
as 2:2024cv14019
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Defendant:
S. Esson, R. Byner, D. Hawley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Babers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake County)
as 5:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Norman B Babers
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
