Cases 61 - 70 of 1,439
Robinson v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Demetric Antonio Robinson
Respondent:
Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKE v. CARTER et al
as 3:2023cv08553
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
J CARTER, J COON, B JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Lee Hines
Defendant:
Ms. Carter and DeShawn Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Farron Taylor
Respondent:
Karen Carter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Carter et al
as 5:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Delano Antonio Rice
Respondent:
Karen Carter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shropshire v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Shropshire
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Tate
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Easterling Correctional Facility and Steve Marsall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shropshire v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Shropshire
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Carter v. Barrs
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Brian Barrs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
