Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Tsoukalas v. Lappin et al
as 3:2008cv00035
Petitioner:
Georgios Tsoukalas
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Walt Wells
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santoro v. Wells et al
as 3:2008cv00022
Petitioner:
Mario F. Santoro
Respondent:
Walt Wells, Harley Lappin and Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCloud v. Grayer et al
as 1:2008cv00599
Plaintiff:
Samuel McCloud
Defendant:
Loren Grayer, R. Holt, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Fertig et al
as 5:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carl Jones
Defendant:
B. Fertig, J. Locus, Paul Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Amparo-Tineo v. Lappin et al
as 3:2008cv00002
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Amparo-Tineo
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Stace Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lappin et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv01117
Plaintiff:
Roy Williams
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and D. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02764
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Vazquez et al
as 2:2007cv00095
Plaintiff:
Nelson Scott
Defendant:
Jose M. Vazquez, Chippi, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abel v. Lappin et al
as 2:2007cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Keith Abel
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, Bethzadia H. Ricoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. Lappin et al
as 2:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Eulee Scott
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and Jose Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
