Cases 61 - 70 of 437
Lane v. Orange County Corrections Dept.
as 6:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Gregory R. Lane
Respondent:
Orange County Corrections Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROBINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
ROYLIN JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
JESSE WILLIAMS, DUVAL, BERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers, Jr. v. Ayers et al
as 5:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Robert Conyers, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Ayers, Kathy Lane, Officer Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
David Lee Moore
Respondent:
Mark Inch, Lane, John Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
White v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome White
Defendant:
Latasha Harris, Sgt. T'onnie Lane, Warden Edward Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUZIER v. OCASIO et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Petitioner:
JOSEPH JAY LUZIER, III
Defendant:
OFFICER OCASIO, SERGEANT LANE, SERGEANT WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayden v. Lane
as 5:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gayden v. Lane
as 8:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luzier v. Ocasio et al
as 6:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jay Luzier, III
Defendant:
Officer Ocasio, Sergeant Lane, Sergeant Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
