Cases 61 - 70 of 438
ROBINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
ROYLIN JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
JESSE WILLIAMS, DUVAL, BERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Lane v. Orange County Corrections Dept.
as 6:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Gregory R. Lane
Respondent:
Orange County Corrections Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Black v. Lane et al
as 3:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Everette L. Black, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Lane, Sgt. R. Molinski and Sgt. S. M. Molinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers, Jr. v. Ayers et al
as 5:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Robert Conyers, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Ayers, Kathy Lane, Officer Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUZIER v. OCASIO et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Petitioner:
JOSEPH JAY LUZIER, III
Defendant:
OFFICER OCASIO, SERGEANT LANE, SERGEANT WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Alessandro, III v. Lane et al
as 3:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. D'Alessandro and Joseph L. D'Alessandro, III
Defendant:
Christopher Lane, Damauro, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
David Lee Moore
Respondent:
Mark Inch, Lane, John Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Lane
as 5:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MOORE v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv04821
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE MOORE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, LANE, JOHN DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
