Cases 61 - 70 of 128
Swain v. Bethune et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01068
Plaintiff:
Willie Swain
Defendant:
Dr. Bethune, Dr. Webb, Nurse Flowrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swain v. Mason et al
as 2:2012cv03757
Plaintiff:
Willie Swain
Defendant:
Mason, Jones, Blue and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swain v. Samuels et al
as 1:2012cv08046
Petitioner:
Donyae Danier Swain
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, Eric Holder and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Swain v. Thomas et al
as 7:2012cv02825
Petitioner:
Bennie Swain
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Tucker et al
as 3:2012cv00867
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Edwards
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Tucker, B. V. Reddish, B. Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00497
Plaintiff:
Bennie Carl Swain
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Board of Pardons and Paroles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Hicks et al
as 3:2012cv00655
Plaintiff:
Frank James
Defendant:
Milton Hicks, Doctor Clark, Shawn Swain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulcin v. Michael D. Crews, et al.
as 3:2012cv00516
Plaintiff:
Prophet Paulcin
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Tucker, B. V. Reddish, Shawn Swain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swain v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv01312
Petitioner:
Curtis Swain
Respondent:
Waren Brown and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swain v. The City of Dekalb County, GA et al
as 1:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ryan Swain
Defendant:
The City of Dekalb County, GA and Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
