Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Batson v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Carlvus DeAngelo Batson
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center, Dr. Garner, Nurse Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuck v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Toney DeAngelo Tuck
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Clayton County Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jamel DeAngelo Thompson
Defendant:
Clayton County Judicial Circuit, Erman J. Tanjuatco, William H. Ison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnifield v. Burrell et al
as 2:2011cv00255
Petitioner:
Demetrius Ray Minnifield
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and DeAngelo Burrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv00657
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Vernon Barnett, James DeLoach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jamel Deangelo Thompson
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Todd Thomas, Peggie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Ferguson v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-11900
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY DEANGELO FERGUSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Adkins v. Ammons
as 4:2009cv00204
Petitioner:
Demetric Deangelo Adkins
Respondent:
Thomas Ammons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Allen et al
as 1:2009cv00697
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Vernon Barnett, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Tuft
as 5:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamel Deangelo Thompson
Defendant:
Nicholas Tuft
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
