Cases 71 - 80 of 442
Riddle v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Ms. Banks, Kayla M. Albrition and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Mercer et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Donald Bryant, Timothy Hardrick and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heagney v. Knight et al
as 8:2021cv01471
Defendant:
Rafeal Ortiz, III, Matthew Tuggle, Dale E. Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
William Richard Heagney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00566
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Antonio Wade Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juzang v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Lt. Smith, Cpt. Knight and Lt. Fountain
Plaintiff:
Carlos Demetrius Juzang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crespo v. Soule et al
as 5:2021cv00228
Defendant:
FNU Blueming, M. Martin, Mark Pleiss and others
Plaintiff:
David A Crespo, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KNIGHT v. BEASLEY et al
as 3:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, CHIEF COUNSELOR Cynthia Stewert, Counselor Veronica Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Carnell Knight and Antony Carnell Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHT v. BEASLEY et al
as 5:2021cv00121
Defendant:
CAPTAIN KAREN THOMAS, CHIEF COUNSELOR CYNTHIA STEWERT, UNIT MANAGER HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARNELL KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Knight
as 1:2021cv01184
Defendant:
Officer Steven Knight
Plaintiff:
Melchizedek Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
