Cases 81 - 90 of 1,782
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, Warden R SHROPSHIRE, C MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STONE v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
RAYMON H STONE and RAYMON H STONE, JR
Defendant:
JANICE JORDAN, GREGORY SAMPSON, PASHION CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Babb v. Brenes et al
as 8:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Hubert Babb
Defendant:
Jason Brenes, Ricky Dixon, Steven H. Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAVOR v. HOLT et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
KIDRON ISRAEL FLAVOR
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONNIE HOLT, SHERIFF MARKLEY, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Joe et al
as 1:2023cv02618
Petitioner:
Thomas Matthew Brown
Respondent:
President Biden Joe and First lady K. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flavor v. Holt et al
as 1:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Kidron Israel Flavor
Defendant:
Connie Holt, Sheriff Markley, Chief Jailer Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Surles v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles and Christopher Isaac Surles
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morra v. Kozyra et al
as 6:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
William J. Morra, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Angelo Kozyra, Monique H. Worrell, Tiana Calaballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
