Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Cooley v. Lamar
as 1:2024cv00215
Respondent:
David Lamar
Petitioner:
Jason Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2023cv00475
Petitioner:
Jesse Jr. Cooley
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. DIXON et al
as 5:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
TREVOR JERMAIN DAVIS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JOHN KOLODZIEJ, E L COOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooley v. Sam Cochran
as 1:2022cv00297
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Mobile Metro Jail and Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hay v. Kyle et al
as 2:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jon Webster Hay
Defendant:
Bruce Kyle, Travis Atkinson, Nicole Calderone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Woodget (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00074
Defendant:
Sedrick S. Woodget
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Cooley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Woodget
as 1:2020cv00568
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Cooley
Defendant:
Sedrick S. Woodget
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang v. Stringer et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Defendant:
Richard Stringer, Sandy Cooley, Deshaun Holloway and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Gene Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
