Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Mayfield (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lashane Hayes
Defendant:
Officer Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. State of Florida
as 3:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Andre Mayfield
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Circuit Court 16th Judicial Circuit, Monroe County, Florida
as 4:2020cv10022
Defendant:
Circuit Court 16th Judicial Circuit, Monroe County, Florida
Plaintiff:
Darren Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILLSMAN v EDWARDS et al
as 3:2019cv00056
Defendant:
MAYFIELD, S BOND, CONE and others
Plaintiff:
RAKEIM JAQUIN HILLSMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillsman v. Edwards et al
as 1:2019cv02557
Defendant:
.M.r Harrison, S. Bond, J. James and others
Plaintiff:
Rakeim Jaquin Hillsman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift Bey v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blaane Marco Swift Bey
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Christopher M. Carr, Richard T. Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Boswell et al
as 4:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Levelle Bradley
Defendant:
Boswell, Kenneth Parker, Dan W. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv00078
Petitioner:
Thomas A. Mayfield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Therian Wimbush v. Gwinnett Judicial Circuit, et al
as 16-14082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERIAN CORNELIA WIMBUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
GWINNETT JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, GWINNETT COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DAN W. MAYFIELD, Chief Assistant District Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
