Cases 1 - 10 of 1,781
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Respondent:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Defendant:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK, FREDDIE HAUGABROOK, DEPUTY DREYFUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Malloy et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Malloy, Capt. Surles, Lt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Norman Hampton
Defendant:
Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Norman Hampton
Defendant:
Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
