Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Williams v. Lawson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: Arthur Williams
Defendant: Angela Lawson, Megan Fulghum, Valicia White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Lewis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant: Counselor Rauls, COII Shakristy Lewis, SGT Henry Clark and others
Plaintiff: Charles Dewayne McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Miles v. Leon County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-11593
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant: LEON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, LEON COUNTY JAIL and LEON COUNTY COURT
Miles McChriston v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10987
Petitioner: MILES TIMOTHY MCCHRISTON
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Christopher Miles v. Fidelity Corporation
as 24-11452
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant: FIDELITY CORPORATION
Christopher Miles v. Tallahassee Police Department, et al
as 24-11451
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant: TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAFE SHISHA and LEON COUNTY JAIL
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant: MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Miles v. Cash America Pawn Shop, et al
as 24-11321
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant: CASH AMERICA PAWN SHOP and TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
MILES v. FIDELITY CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MILES
Defendant: FIDELITY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?