Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Johnson v. Dr. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Collins, Dr. A. Acevedo, Michelle Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick, James v. County of Palm Beach et al
as 9:2024cv80058
Plaintiff:
James Tyrell Frederick
Defendant:
County of Palm Beach, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, Michael Perard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. ACEVEDO et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
JELO ACEVEDO and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cancela et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02480
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO ACEVEDO CANCELA and CASSANDRA ESCOBAR CABAN
Defendant:
Grady Judd, SEAN JONES, Sheriff Grady Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Salaman et al
as 8:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Krystal Salaman, Ashley Blue, Douglas Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuten v. Nocco, et al
as 8:2021cv02397
Plaintiff:
Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant:
Chris Nocco, Home Wav L.L.C, Officer J. Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. State of Florida (Collier County)
as 2:2020cv00869
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, DOC
Petitioner:
Juan Tomas Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Acevedo v. United States of America
as 0:2020cv61465
Plaintiff:
Santos Acevedo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ACEVEDO v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2019cv00262
Defendant:
T THOMAS and T THORPE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACEVEDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Troup County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Troup County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Jason Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
