Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Swanson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00511
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Swanson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adam Calcote v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 15-14928
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADAM LEE CALCOTE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Che' Clemons v. Warden, et al
as 14-11850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHE' BERNARD CLEMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ADAM LEE, Deputy Warden, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer / D1 Dorm and others
Calcote v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2012cv01346
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Calcote
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Davis, et al
as 4:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brown
Defendant:
Joseph Davis, Lyons, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Owens et al
as 1:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brown
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Joseph Davis, Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Tatum et al
as 1:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Che' Bernard Clemons
Defendant:
Clay Tatum, Adam Lee, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salter v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00349
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Salter
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, John Cummings, Willie Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stokes et al v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
Mack Stokes, Wendall Adams, Lester Thomason and others
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, John Cummings, Willie Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
