Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections - Marion
as 5:2024cv00468
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Adrian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Houston County Jail (INMATE 1)
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Adrian Harris
Defendant:
Houston County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawton et al v. Houston County Jail
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoghegan, Taurean Davis, Gregory Muise and others
Defendant:
Houston County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey v. Baldwin County Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Defendant:
Lieutenant Pettway, Baldwin County Corrections and Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lazo, Adrian v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv22661
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lazo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Fabian Woods, Jr. v. Adrian West, et al
as 24-12106
Defendant:
DARDELL, TURNAGE, LETITIA BURKS and others
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR.
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Defendant:
SARGEANT TUKES, OFFICER EVONNE MARIE FOYE, OFFICER RAPUNZEL TUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00497
Defendant:
Antonio Thomas
Plaintiff:
Adrian J. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple, Adrian v. Tony et al
as 0:2024cv60445
Plaintiff:
Adrian Whipple
Defendant:
Sheriff Gregory Tony, Captain J. Polacio, Sergeant Timothy Rolle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy, Adrian v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60248
Plaintiff:
Adrian Hardy
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
