Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 884
Wheat, Loyd B. v. Denton
as 2:2024cv14192
Plaintiff: Loyd Brandon Wheat
Defendant: Nita Gail Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Jester
as 4:2024cv00153
Petitioner: Brandon Keith Bolden
Respondent: T. Jester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRALL v. HOWARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00170
Plaintiff: BRANDON MORRALL
Defendant: ANITA HOWARD and SANDRA MATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Persad et al
as 2:2024cv14169
Plaintiff: Jerry Sneed
Defendant: Devanard Persad, Cory Gitlin, Zach Ferrira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00679
Plaintiff: Lionel Russell
Defendant: Lyons Logan, Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Edwards v. USA
as 24-11721
Petitioner: BRANDON LEE EDWARDS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sylvester v. Rowlins (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: Brandon Sylvester
Defendant: Robert Rowlins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCMILLIAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff: XAVIER T MCMILLIAN
Defendant: DELDRON JONES, BRANDON GRANGER and ISAAC REDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester v. Rowlins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: Brandon Sylvester
Defendant: Robert Rowlins and Jimmie Brayboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Department of Corrections, State of Florida (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01202
Petitioner: Brandon Roman
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?